Every once in a while, the Internet has a debate so random and wonderful, it somehow unites us through its division. In 2015, we had the infamous striped dress debacle. (It's blue and black, by the way.) Now, there's another wacky poll to consider: Is young Robert De Niro sexier than young Al Pacino? Or vice versa? After scrolling through a bunch of vintage photographs, I texted my friends for their opinions. One declared that Al Pacino was "SO fine" in The Godfather. Another simply wrote, "AL PACINO" in all-caps. The Internet may be divided, but my focus group was not. Even Reese, who posted the poll, thought Pacino was the obvious choice. Personally, I don't think the debate makes any sense—because they look alike! Dare I say they're the same man in two fonts? The more throwback thirst-traps I see, the more certain I am that we're looking at a set of long-lost brothers, even if they look wildly different in old age. Just take a look at this picture of the men posing next to each other. |
|
|
The most defeated character in Succession has undefeated style. |
| Our favorite books of the year delve into everything from prisons to utopias, slashers to ghost stories, and American dreaming to American failures. |
|
|
Mack Weldon combines timeless style with innovative fabrics to make sharp clothes for daily life. 20% off first orders of $100+. |
|
|
| Louis Leterrier is a die-hard Fast & Furious fan. The story begins all the way back in 2001, while the young filmmaker and his star—future action icon Jason Statham—took a break from production on The Transporter to see The Fast and the Furious. That night, the duo's approach to life and cinema changed forever. That's exactly why Leterrier was scared to death to take on Fast X. "You don't want to be known as the guy who messed up Fast & Furious," the charming French director says with a laugh. "Like, 'Yeah, Fast was great, and then Louis Leterrier came onboard and destroyed it." |
|
|
| In a country essentially founded on the basis of ideas on paper, any subsequent typos, omissions, or misplaced splinters of law can have profound consequences down the line. Example: in 1866, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in a case called Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company. One of the main points of the dispute was whether or not corporations should be considered people under the provisions of the 14th Amendment. The issue was so inflamed that the Court deliberately avoided it entirely in its final decision, much to the dismay of Justice Stephen Field, a career railroad hack who had his thumb on the scale throughout the arguments. |
|
|
| My mother and I have been playing poker together for nearly twenty-five years. For Christmas recently, I wanted to give her a gift that encompassed our shared passion. I hired a bespoke calligraphist to draw something up, all curlicues and gold foil. My mother peeled open the envelope and pulled out the note. It read, "Merry Christmas, Mom. This certificate may be redeemed for a weeklong, all-expenses-paid vacation to Las Vegas, Nevada, and $1,000 for use at a poker table of your choice. May you always catch on the river." |
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment