Saturday, January 10, 2026 |
|
|
Writing a comprehensive guide to Rolex watches is no mean feat. We are, after all, talking about one of the most iconic and influential brands not just in the world of horology but, well, the entire world. Luckily, Esquire contributor Oren Hartov was willing to take on the challenge. His rundown of everything Rolex is now live, and it is impressive. He takes us through the history of the company, breaks down the fifteen—count 'em, fifteen!—different collections under the Crown's umbrella, and points out all the notable references you should have on your radar. Even if you weren't in the market for a new watch before reading, you will be by the end. —Jonathan Evans, style director |
|
|
Our indispensable guide covers 15 collections, hundreds of references, and countless ways to wear the Crown. |
The largest watch brand in the world by turnover, Rolex needs no introduction. A global luxury juggernaut, its coronet logo is one of the most widely recognized in the world. Despite production of over one million pieces annually, demand for its wares far outstrips supply, with customers routinely waiting months or years for highly desirable models. The health of the secondary market is even more stunning, with brand-new watches trading for multiples of their retail value immediately upon debut. For many, a Rolex Submariner, GMT-Master II, or Cosmograph Daytona remains the ideal "grail" as well as the perfect "flex"—a high-end status symbol robust enough to stand up to a life of hard living (or a few decades of life at the office).
Rather than attempting to list every single watch in every available configuration, we've outlined the key attributes of each collection, listed any sub-models, and named a reference that we believe is representative of its distinctive characteristics. Using this handy guide, you should be able to get a feel for the Crown's different models and what makes each one "tick." |
|
|
I didn't need a travel camera. But I was planning a big family trip to Australia and connecting with my inner Wes Anderson, and I decided I deserved one. The problem? I had no idea what I actually wanted. Did I want a sleek little point-and-shoot for easy memory-making snaps? Did I want a vlogger's dream machine for capturing my daily custard tart content? Or should I just go full Ansel Adams and invest in a rig so legit that airport security always pulls me aside? Naturally, I spiraled. I researched. I also talked to an actual expert, Daniel Norton, Adorama's 42West Editorial Manager, who walked me through which cameras make sense depending on what kind of traveler (and human) you are. Of course, the best camera is the one you'll actually carry around and use. (That could even mean a good phone camera.) It's about balancing image quality, ease of use, and how much gear you'll realistically lug on your trip. |
|
|
Earlier on Thursday, in something of a surprise, the Senate voted to advance a resolution that would require the president to seek congressional approval before taking any further military action against Venezuela. Five Republicans voted for the resolution as did Senator John Fetterman, whatever he is these days. As you can see, the president called out the Republicans by name and, while I wouldn't mind to see all of them voted out, I tremble to think what manner of dolts and loons would replace them. What the president said about the War Powers Act was true de facto but not de jure. What the president describes as "violating" Article II, and his reference to past presidents' validation through themselves and their Departments of Justice is really a reference to the fact that various administrations have felt free to ignore the War Powers Act ever since its passage in 1973. The courts have steered clear of giving a ruling on its constitutionality, but it's lain there in the middle of constitutional-law debates like a dead fish for all these decades. Now the Senate has decided to pick it up and go upside the president's head with it. |
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment